For this comparative analysis, I decided to look at Archives, the journal of the British
Records Association, and the Journal of
Library Administration. I chose Archives because I feel that archival
administration is the field of the information sciences I am least familiar
with, and wanted to gain a better understanding of this field. I chose the Journal of Library Administration because I felt that it would help
me gain a better understanding of my chosen specialization of public libraries
(while providing a broad perspective on libraries in general).
Archives is a scholarly, peer-reviewed
journal aimed primarily at an academic audience. According to the Ulrich’s Web Directory, the
journal publishes material related to British history and records. The journal is meant to serve academics and
others interested in research in archives.
Publishing began in 1949 and the journal is published
semi-annually. This journal isn’t
necessarily one that I would need to access on a regular basis for my own
studies, but is a useful tool for finding out more about archives.
The Journal of Library Administration has
been published since 1980 and is published eight times per year, according to
Ulrich’s Web Directory. The journal is
published by Routledge and is peer-reviewed.
Material published is aimed at individuals working in libraries. This journal is one that I could personally
see being very useful in my own career.
It covers a broad range of the LIS field, and many of the articles are very
applicable to someone working in a public library.
Academic
journals, whether peer-reviewed or not, are a wealth of information for the LIS
student and LIS professional and anyone planning on having a career in the
field should certainly be familiar with the variety of journals that is
available. In my limited experience and
research thus far, I have been surprised at the sheer amount of information and
articles available. I look forward to subscribing
to several journals myself in order to learn more about issues relevant to the
LIS field.
No comments:
Post a Comment